.
Feedback

Agency relationships

Do you know what an "agency relationship" is?

I don’t want a relationship…I just want to date for a while!

Understood, that is reasonable, people should have the opportunity to get to know each other before committing to one person.  If we are dating then we should start by hanging out and having fun, no commitment, and no pressure. In fact, except for your family, it is generally understood that we will get to know each other over time and during that time decide to what degree we want to commit to each other.

So when a Realtor that you meet for the first time puts a three page, in triplicate, document in front of you and says “sign here so we can go out”, you might feel a little put off or guarded about this pressure to “commit”. But know that she is just doing her job. She wants to work for you and ultimately find you the house of your dreams but the State of Connecticut has stated that in order to do that she has to first explain “agency representation” and have you acknowledge that she is working for you.

Agency representation was created in the late nineties because the State recognized real estate transactions as having the potential to be one sided with everyone working on behalf of the seller. In most cases, the seller has agreed to pay a commission to the listing agency who then offers a portion of that commission to the agency who brings a buyer. This is still how it works today but the laws of agency relationships were established in order for the buyer’s agent to have fiduciary responsibilities to the buyer—a “relationship of trust and confidence, as between trustee and beneficiary, attorney and client, principle and agent.”

For the rest of this article go to www.fromtowntoshore.com

 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Weston-Redding-Easton Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Thomas Paine June 18, 2013 at 01:43 pm
Why is it the panel for this event does not include a single advocate for gun-owners' rights? WithRead More all due respect to Chief McNamara, why does the panel no include a person who can speak to gun safety from a gun-owning civilian's perspective? ML, you claim that the assembled folks "do not offer judgements about gun ownership" but they are not including a single voice that can offer perspective on gun ownership. I have been to "education" sessions sponsored by Meg's March for Change and they are one-sided indoctrinations into gun control advocacy. >>>> I was in Hartford for the public hearings in January when both Meg and March co-founder Nancy gave their personal testimonies and they all but threatened the legislators on the panel with election day retribution for all those who did not tow the gun-control line of thinking (i.e. March and CAGV). To suggest that Meg "does not offer judgements" if fallacious at best, disingenuous at worst.