.
Feedback

John McKinney Running Unopposed in 28th District

The Republican serves as the Senate Minority Leader.

Update, Nov. 8 — 1:51 p.m.

John McKinney received 2,865 votes in Easton.

Update, Nov. 7 - 1:38 a.m.

John McKinney received 18,931 votes in Fairfield.

Update, Nov. 7 — 12:05 a.m.

John McKinney received 1,251 votes in Weston.

Update, 9:47 p.m.

John McKinney, running unopposed, celebrated victory in Fairfield Tuesday night.

"You never take it for granted when you're running for office," McKinney said, adding he was "just as excited today as I was in 1998."

"It's great to see the same people who helped me win in 1998. Thank you."

Original article:

It's smooth sailing today for John McKinney, who is running unopposed in the 28th Senate District, which includes the towns of Newtown, Weston, Easton and Fairfield.

The Republican serves as the Senate Minority Leader, a position he has held since 2007. He is serving his seventh term representing the 28th District.

A resident of Fairfield, he is the son of the late Congressman Stewart McKinney and his wife Lucie.

According to his website, McKinney "graduated from Fairfield Prep in 1982, earned a Bachelor of Arts degree from Yale University in 1986 and received his Juris Doctorate from the University of Connecticut School of Law, with honors, in 1994. Prior to being elected to the General Assembly, John practiced law at Cummings and Lockwood and was a law clerk to Connecticut Supreme Court Justice Richard N. Palmer."

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Weston-Redding-Easton Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Thomas Paine June 18, 2013 at 01:43 pm
Why is it the panel for this event does not include a single advocate for gun-owners' rights? WithRead More all due respect to Chief McNamara, why does the panel no include a person who can speak to gun safety from a gun-owning civilian's perspective? ML, you claim that the assembled folks "do not offer judgements about gun ownership" but they are not including a single voice that can offer perspective on gun ownership. I have been to "education" sessions sponsored by Meg's March for Change and they are one-sided indoctrinations into gun control advocacy. >>>> I was in Hartford for the public hearings in January when both Meg and March co-founder Nancy gave their personal testimonies and they all but threatened the legislators on the panel with election day retribution for all those who did not tow the gun-control line of thinking (i.e. March and CAGV). To suggest that Meg "does not offer judgements" if fallacious at best, disingenuous at worst.