.
Feedback

"Weston Yesterday" Exhibit

 ,   Add to calendar
 Weston-Redding-Easton  See map

Have you ever been curious about Weston's past?  It's fascinating, and you'll have an opportunity to take a look back in time at Weston's colorful history this weekend, and throughout the month of January at the Historical Society.  History buffs, residents with school-aged children, life-long residents and new members in town alike will appreciate this exhibit.


Visitors can view the"Olde Weston" photo exhibit, which includes more than 30 enlargements of old photographs of Weston from 1880 to the 1920's as well as a horse-drawn carriage from the early 1900s and some other historic pieces from Weston's past.  Docents will be on hand to answer questions about the exhibit and also offer their unique anecdotes.


It's FREE, it's interesting, and also a wonderful opportunity to learn something new about our extraordinary town...not one to miss!

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Thomas Paine June 18, 2013 at 01:43 pm
Why is it the panel for this event does not include a single advocate for gun-owners' rights? WithRead More all due respect to Chief McNamara, why does the panel no include a person who can speak to gun safety from a gun-owning civilian's perspective? ML, you claim that the assembled folks "do not offer judgements about gun ownership" but they are not including a single voice that can offer perspective on gun ownership. I have been to "education" sessions sponsored by Meg's March for Change and they are one-sided indoctrinations into gun control advocacy. >>>> I was in Hartford for the public hearings in January when both Meg and March co-founder Nancy gave their personal testimonies and they all but threatened the legislators on the panel with election day retribution for all those who did not tow the gun-control line of thinking (i.e. March and CAGV). To suggest that Meg "does not offer judgements" if fallacious at best, disingenuous at worst.