.
Feedback

Edward Steichen and Paul Caponigro--Seeing the Redding Landscape

 ,   Add to calendar
 Weston-Redding-Easton  See map

On Sunday, January 27th, 3 pm at the library, David Heald, director of photographic services at the Guggenheim Museum in New York, will present “Edward Steichen and Paul Caponigro-Seeing the Redding Landscape,” featuring the work of these two giants of 20th century photography.  Mr. Heald plans to focus on the fact that both of the men lived and worked in Redding, but will show work from all phases of their careers, including fascinating brief video clips of each of the two photographers.  He'll end with a question and answer session.  Admission is free, light refreshments will be served and though not required, a reservation is requested to help plan for space.  You can sign up at the library or call them at 938-2545.  If you have any questions, call Emily d'Aulaire at 938-3612.

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Thomas Paine June 18, 2013 at 01:43 pm
Why is it the panel for this event does not include a single advocate for gun-owners' rights? WithRead More all due respect to Chief McNamara, why does the panel no include a person who can speak to gun safety from a gun-owning civilian's perspective? ML, you claim that the assembled folks "do not offer judgements about gun ownership" but they are not including a single voice that can offer perspective on gun ownership. I have been to "education" sessions sponsored by Meg's March for Change and they are one-sided indoctrinations into gun control advocacy. >>>> I was in Hartford for the public hearings in January when both Meg and March co-founder Nancy gave their personal testimonies and they all but threatened the legislators on the panel with election day retribution for all those who did not tow the gun-control line of thinking (i.e. March and CAGV). To suggest that Meg "does not offer judgements" if fallacious at best, disingenuous at worst.